Citizenship in Nativist Times

Over deze publicatie

Over the past two decades, debates about diversity, belonging, and feeling at home have intensified significantly. A particularly prominent argument posits that growing diversity threatens societal cohesion, eroding citizens' commitment to ideals such as solidarity and justice. Similarly widespread is the claim that various societal divides— between urban and rural populations, politicians and constituents, cosmopolitans and communitarians—are widening rapidly, leaving many feeling abandoned and disillusioned.

As perceptions of deepening divides gain traction, citizenship has become a central site of political struggle. Populist and nativist forces increasingly dictate who counts as a ‘real’ citizen, often undermining democratic principles, the rule of law, and the welfare state. Citizenship—with all its perplexities—is the central focus of this collection. Through case studies and theoretical reflections, essays by wellestablished international experts explore the tensions and intersections among the political, social, cultural, and academic dimensions of citizenship. From rights and representation to social welfare and public discourse, the contributions question how citizenship is being restricted, reimagined, or reclaimed—and by whom.

Menno Hurenkamp is Professor of Democracy at the University of Humanistic Studies in Utrecht.
Tamar de Waal is Associate Professor in Legal Philosophy and Citizenship at the Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam.

In this volume, the valuable work of Jan Willem Duyvendak provides the point of departure for a reflection on key questions of citizenship today. It shows that in periods of democratic and rule-of-law erosion, that universities, academics, and scholarship have an essential role to play - not only in producing knowledge, but in sustaining the moral, civic, and institutional conditions of a free society. - Michael Ignatieff, academic, author, and former politician